I spend a great deal of time on YouTube, and I thought that from time to time, I would share some of my favorite videos.
For many years I have loved classical ballet. This video captures the magic created by some of that art’s greatest performers. The music is the Adagio from Spartacus by Aram Khachaturian.
Here’s a link to the results of the poll conducted by The Millions. And here are a few comments on those results:
I somehow thought The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen was a pre-2000 novel. Otherwise I would, at the very least, have put it on my list of semi-finalists. I listened to this novel in my car, and I remember at least twice having to pull over because I was laughing so hard or, alternatively, just amazed or outraged…anyway, I loved it.
In a completely different vein, Franzen wrote this intensely moving essay about his father’s battle with Alzheimer’s. At this point in time, it’s a battle with uneven odds – the disease invariably wins, inflicting horrendous suffering on victim and family alike. It happened to us. The victims were my mother, the sufferer; we three children; and most of all, my father, whom she deserted through no fault of her own when he most needed her. Dad died in 2000. My mother continued on, pointlessly, for another four years.
(Am I still angry about this? You bet I am.)
As for the remaining selections made by the panel:
I have not read Austerlitz by W.G. Sebald, but I found the stories in The Emigrants extremely compelling, the first story, “Dr. Henry Selwyn,” especially so.
I wanted to include an Alice Munro title on my list. Either the collection the panel chose, or the one selected by the readers. I devour her stories; they are superb.Generally speaking, I am a big fan of Ian McEwan’s writing. I liked Atonement, but not as much as several of his other titles, such as Saturday and Enduring Love.
Gilead by Marilynne Robinson made both lists. Robinsons’ writing is, at times, quite gorgeous, but I have to work to get through her books. Anyway, I liked Home better than Gilead.
As for Mortals by Norman Rush, I got about a third of the way through and had to throw in the towel. I loved Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro, but I didn’t care for Never Let Me Go and didn’t finish it. My annoyance with that novel may be due to a personal animus toward works dealing with a dystopian future – or any kind of future, for that matter. I prefer fiction set in the present or the past.
I’ve heard of most of the remaining titles on the panel’s list but have not read them. (Pastoralia by George Saunders, Stranger Things Happen by Kelly Link, and American Genius, A Comedy by Lynne Tillman are completely new to me.)
I was glad to see Unaccustomed Earth on the Readers’ list of selections – and not just because it was the only title on my list of five to be mentioned in either place. In the comment section, Marie states: “I was so happy to see that Readers included Jhumpa Lahiri after a snubbing by the panel.” Here here.
Finally, I just have to ask: where is the crime fiction? No Reginald Hill, Kate Atkinson, Ruth Rendell, P.D. James, Donna Leon, Karin Fossum, Alexander McCall Smith? IMHO, they are among the finest writers at work today.
I can be opinionated, I know, but I think – I hope! – I can also be open-minded. So, in that spirit, recommendations are welcome.
Five favorite fiction titles of the new millennium (actually eighteen, with twelve nonfiction titles and some music thrown in for good measure)
So I get an e-mail from The Millions, asking me to name the five best fiction titles I’ve read since the new millennium. I ignored the request for as long as I could. Then I got prodded again, informed that the deadline was fast approaching, and would I mind awfully responding to this request?
So, here goes…
I began by looking at my yearly “Best of” compilations on this blog, and at older lists that I’ve archived in hard copy. I was facing, as you can well imagine, a challenging task.
What became clear at the outset was that many of my favorite books in recent years have been nonfiction:
***review*** – actually I did more than one post on this astounding book, which introduced me to, among other wonders, French people on stilts: . Equally amazing was the discovery, in the pages of Robb’s chronicle, of a connection between one Madame de Genlis (1746-1830) and a small, very old, overlooked volume on my own bookshelf: .
In honor of France, that rich repository of the arts, here is the Barcarolle from one of my favorite operas, Tales of Hoffmann (“Les Contes d’Hoffmann”) by Jacques Offenbach. The singers are soprano Irina Iordachescu and mezzo-soprano Cristina Iordachescu. (And yes – they are sisters, from Romania.)
Food is ordinarily my least favorite subject for either reading or conversation. But Michael Pollan offers some revelatory insights on the subject; in addition, he writes with wit and brio.
and its companion volume, which I reviewed:.
All of the essays in this collection are excellent; several are extraordinarily powerful. I was horrified and outraged by Susan Casey’s “Our Oceans Are Turning into Plastic…Are We?” and fascinated by Caroline Alexander’s portrait of mountaineer Reinhold Messner. Alex Ross, whose writing about music is superb, wowed me yet again with his analysis of the miracle that is Mozart’s music.
And Eric Konigsburg’s “Praire Fire” will haunt me forever.
Here are Jeffrey Tate and the English Chamber Orchestra performing the final movement of Mozart’s Symphony No. 41, the “Jupiter:”
( The individual who posted this video has appended some very nice commentary; you can read it here.)
I treasure the two histories artfully woven by Italian journalist Andrea di Robilant from the cloth of his own history: . If you’re looking for a love story with the resonance of Romeo and Juliet, look no further than A Venetian Affair.
Like Andrea di Robilant, Josceline Dimbleby reaches into her own past to tell the poignant story of May and Amy Gaskell. This is the kind of quintessential English story that I am continually seeking. The fact of this book’s strange synergy with Penelope Lively’s novel The Photograph only adds to its intrigue and fascination.
At this point, there are four biographies I’d like to mention. Jenny Uglow’s Nature’s Engraver introduced me to Thomas Bewick, an artist of whom I had not previously heard. One of the joys of this book lies in the in which Uglow recreates Bewick’s world, in a way that only the best historians can do.
I could not find words sufficient to praise Donald Worster’s magisterial life of John Muir. This is probably the most poetical biography I have ever read. I was flagging passages of exceptional eloquence; this is how the book looked by the time I finished it:
John Muir’s name is being heard rather frequently at present, with Ken Burns’s documentary series on the national parks about to be shown on public television. If you want to know more about this great man’s eventful life and tremendous achievements, look no further than Worster’s superb volume.
I’m going to slip a 1999 biography in here, since it pairs so well with Worster’s book: Like Donald Worster, Witold Rybczynski gives us a meticulous yet leisurely examination of a life of consequence. In the process, an entire world is recreated. One thing that fascinated me in particular was the story of Olmsted’s travels in the antebellum South. He recorded his observations, and they include his Northerner’s incredulity that such a way of life could not only exist but could be taken for granted as right and normal.
At any rate – outstanding biographies of two great men. I have given them both as gifts to my brother, who has a deep and abiding interest in American history.
Finally, there is this book: . It may be a cliche to say a book changed your life, but – this book changed my life. As I read about the composer’s childhood and youth, the grandeur and mystery of nineteenth century Russia rose up before me; it became a world that was almost more real than the one I was actually in. And then the music…I’ve always loved Tchaikovsky, but I began to hear his works in a new way, especially the symphonies. And for the first time I became acquainted with the magical Suites Number One and Two for Orchestra, courtesy of my husband, who is so expert at ferreting out the world’s hidden musical treasures.
In a post on Leonard Bernstein, I embedded a video of Michael Tilson Thomas leading the San Francisco Symphony in the fiery final of Tchaikovsky’s Fourth Symphony. In the clip below, Barenboim leads in the Chicago Symphony – known as “the mighty Chicago” in our house – in a performance of the same music at Carnegie Hall in 1997:
And here is Bernstein knocking himself in an effort to teach music appreciation to an audience of skeptical teenagers:
“I want it, I want it!” – few things in life can ever top Bernstein when he’s in full showmanship mode. As these young people attained adulthood, they probably realized that their teacher meant a particular kind of wanting, more accurately, I think, called yearning: for love, for a meaningful life, for reassurance as the end of that life draws near.
I was supposed to be writing about fiction, right? Ah well…there are many more nonfiction titles that I could mention here, but it really is time to move on.
My original list of fiction titles from which to cull my five favorites numbered twenty-eight. I made no distinction between novels and story collections, or “literary” fiction and crime fiction. I found that I was doing battle with myself on several fronts. While I wanted to name authors that I feel deserve more recognition, I believed equally that I should try to evaluate each title on its merits, whether or not the author were already well known. I wanted to make sure that at least one title from my favorite genre made the cut, but again, I didn’t want to include such a title solely for that reason. No worries on that score, really; I’ve read plenty of terrific crime fiction since 2000.
After much proverbial gnashing of teeth, I settled on the following Five:
Lack of coherent structure is one of my chief complaints concerning contemporary fiction. Case Histories, on the other hand, is one of the most elegantly structured modern novels I’ve read. In addition, Atkinson made me laugh out loud – that is, when I didn’t feel like weeping.
The two story collections could not be more different from each other, yet both, in their uniqueness, are superb. I reviewed the Lahiri at some length in this space; the Silber, more briefly. When asked to select a book and lead the discussion in January for my friends in AAUW, I was torn between these two titles. Ideas of Heaven had a slight edge because of its stunning variety of subject matter. I look forward to re-reading it.
I consider Dialogues of the Dead to be among the best in Reginald Hill’s Dalziel and Pascoe series. (Two others I strongly recommend are On Beulah Height and The Wood Beyond.)
John McGahern’s gorgeously written novel is in a class by itself. By the Lake plumbs the human condition so deeply that it breaks through to a kind of eternal truth; namely, that certain rites of daily life confer a kind of holiness and immortality on those who are caught up in them.
I look forward to reading By the Lake again – and again…
I began my e-mail to Max of The Millions (Maximilian?) with the sentence: “This is excruciating!” For one thing, there were numerous titles that I consider to be on a par with the above five. Among them: The Careful Use of Compliments and The Miracle at Speedy Motors by Alexander McCall Smith, The Northern Clemency by Philip Hensher, The Housekeeper and the Professor by Yoko Ogawa, To Heaven By Water by Justin Cartwright, Saturday by Ian McEwan, Digging To America by Anne Tyler, The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafon, The Other Side of You by Salley Vickers, Intuition by Allegra Goodman, The House on Fortune Street by Margot Livesey, The Girl of His Dreams by Donna Leon, Both Ways Is the Only Way I Want It by Maile Meloy… and on and on. It’s ridiculous, as you can plainly see.
The exercise was enjoyable, if a bit masochistic!
[Click here for Part One of this post.]
Thanks to Bish’s Beat for spotlighting my review of Peter Turnbull’s Turning Point. (More cute grandkids here, too!)
And speaking of Peter Turnbull – which I do, at every opportunity – another link to the above review was provided by Donna at Big Beat from Badsville. I was delighted to discover this blog, which focuses with energy and enthusiasm on Scottish crime fiction.
Shelf Love: I deeply appreciate the sentiments expressed by Teresa concerning a passion for reading. Needless to say – but I’ll say it anyway – I share them wholeheartedly. If you scroll further down the lovely Sunday Salon post, you’ll find “Notes from the Reading Life.” Under “Books To Remember,” Teresa cites my review of Zeitoun.
Teresa has also linked to Jonathan Veitch’s convocation address at Occidental College. It is well worth reading.
Once again- thanks to the bloggers who have recently linked to Books to the Ceiling. As I’ve mentioned before, writing this blog has proved to be much harder and more challenging than I had originally anticipated, so it is very rewarding to receive praise and recognition, especially from those who are themselves gifted and perceptive writers.
In recent weeks, a number of bloggers have graciously linked to posts on Books to the Ceiling. I would like to return the compliment.
First, many thanks to Kerrie of Mysteries in Paradise. Kerrie nominated my blog for a Splash Award! Kerrie’s blog is a great source for reviews and other interesting news concerning crime fiction, to which, in her own words, she is “seriously addicted.” (Oh dear – some of us know that feeling all too well!)
A critic and literary historian at Texas A&M University, D.G. Myers writes the wonderfully erudite Commonplace Blog. He has done me the honor of placing Books to the Ceiling on his blogroll. In addition, in a post dated July 9, Myers included a link to my review of The Little Stranger. (Shana Tovah to you, too, Professor. One has sung the apple-and-honey song many times…)
I’ve been reading and enjoying Booksplease for quite a while now. Margaret’s reviews and comments are always worth reading, and she writes beautifully. In a post dated July 14, she mentions that she checked Peter Robinson’s A Strange Affair out of her local library as per my recommendation.
I love Nan’s blog, Letters from a Hill Farm! Of course you do, you may well retort – she likes all the same authors you do! Yep – she does – a woman of rare discernment, I’d say. Nan’s blog also features lots of recipes (often for just the kind of delicacies I can no longer eat, alas) and great photos and video clips. It is a very enjoyable place to hang out.
Earlier this month, Nan posted a review of An April Shroud, the fourth entry in Reginald Hill’s Dalziel & Pascoe series. I like the way she describes herself as being “powerless” over this extraordinary series of crime novels; I feel the same way about them. When I realized that this is the book in which Ellie and Peter get married, I got online and ordered it immediately. I came to this series with Bones and Silence, the 1990 title that won the Gold Dagger. By then, the series had already been running for twenty years. I wasn’t sure if I could read the older novels with the same degree of enjoyment that I’ve experienced with the later ones, but I read A Ruling Passion (1973) two years ago and loved it. Now – on to An April Shroud. Bless the good folks at Felony & Mayhem for reprinting these titles. At the conclusion of her review of An April Shroud, Nan linked to my recent post on this fine small press.
Justin of Justin’s Ramble describes himself as “the merry nerd of Nottingham,” but he strikes me as a person of wide-ranging interests. I enjoy his bright, discursive prose style, and he has certainly got VERY CUTE GRANDCHILDREN. (I get the biggest kick out of all these besotted grandparents – long may they dote!) Justin has paid me the compliment of including this blog on his list of “Fab sites.”
One other thing about Justin: here’s his picture: . Is it just me, or is there a slight resemblance to Ian McEwan…?
I have more bloggers to thank, but I’ve run out of juice for now, so – more to come!
This past July, I had the pleasure of presenting The Art of the Mystery at the Glenwood Branch of the Howard County Library. Next month, I’ll be presenting It’s A Mystery! at The Bain Center in Columbia. This too is a library program.
This time I am going to emphasis the function of setting in crime fiction. My efforts have been greatly aided by G.J. Demko’s thoughts on the subject. Demko, an emeritus professor at Dartmouth, has posted his highly engaging essays on a site called Landscapes of Crime.
Many of us crime fiction fans consider the selection of books to be an essential part of travel preparations. Getting ready for my trip to Italy last May, I did quite a bit of reading in advance of the journey. I read portions of these three titles:
And I read Shirley Hazzard’s wonderful memoir: I was about half way through Jordan Lancaster’s fascinating history of Naples when we took off: . It was one of the two “perfect books” that came with me on this memorable journey, the other being – and you were wondering when I’d get to this! – a mystery: . Michael Dibdin, whom we lost most prematurely in 2007, wrote the Aurelio Zen series, which I always enjoyed. Zen turns up in various Italian locales; in Cosi Fan Tutti, he is smack in the middle of Naples and engaged in a hilarious Keystone cops type of scenario involving organized crime, jealous lovers, covetous older women, and lots more. The proceedings are all the more entertaining for Zen’s deep knowledge of the Neapolitan landscape – and the Neapolitan underworld.
But what if you’re not going to Italy? Well, then I have only two words for you: Why not?? Just kidding ( sort of) – there are ways to find mysteries set just about anywhere. Wheredunnit is one of the most comprehensive sources; Eurocrime also does a great job. I’m partial to the “Location Index” on Stop You’re Killing Me because of its precise breakdown of places within the United Kingdom (click on “British Isles;” select “England – excluding London”).
There are sites and blogs dedicated to mysteries set in a particular country or region. One that I recently discovered that’s devoted to Scottish crime fiction is Big Beat from Badsville. There’s also a Scandinavian Crime Fiction Blog and a site devoted to Italian Mysteries. I also recommend Detectives Without Borders: A Forum for International Crime Fiction.
So – with regard to the October 20th presentation, have I given the game away? By no means! There will be a new book list, new titles to talk about, and yet another chance to exchange views and recommendations with fellow mystery lovers.
[ Click on the link to the Bain Center at the top of this post for directions.]
Hope to see you there!
A group of us are planning to see the Metropolitan Opera’s HD broadcast of Tosca next month. I am really excited about this! Tosca possesses in abundance the two elements critical to any great opera: high drama and gorgeous music.
Tosca features three arias that are justly famous: Recondita armonia and E lucevan le stelle, sung by Mario Cavaradossi, and Vissi d’arte, sung by Floria Tosca.
Here are the first two, sung by Placido Domingo in the role of Cavaradossi. When he made this film in 1992, Domingo was at the height of his considerable powers, as you will see:
The role of Floria Tosca will forever be linked with the fiery soprano Maria Callas. There are those who do not care for her voice, while others worship her as “La Divina.” I don’t think anyone disputes the fact that she was a terrific actress. Here she sing Vissi d’arte at Covent Garden in London. (The date is not given, but I believe this performance was filmed in 1964.)
Here is the same aria, sung by the luminous Rumanian soprano Angela Gheorgiu;
These are just some of the most famous treasures bequeathed to us by this composer:
At the front of her novel Puccini’s Ghosts, Morag Joss placed a quotation from a review (in the Daily Express, June 8, 1927) of Turandot. The performance took place at Covent Garden a scant three years after Puccini’s death.
“Covent Garden was haunted last night. It was haunted by the gentle and immaculate ghost of Puccini…who died with the final bars of Turandot still imprisoned within his brain, who disappeared to solve an enigma more terrible and profound than any created by the Princess Turandot. We like to think that Puccini revisited the glimpses of the moon last night to observe the opera’s performance in England, where his works are so universally cherished, to watch his tricksy spirits at their revels. We imagined him pleased with the magnificent production and the sensation it created.
Let me tell you about this book: during the entire second half of it, I was in a state of utter disbelief and rage! I’ve since calmed down, but if reading about the nightmare scenario described by Dave Eggers got me that angry, I hate to think of how the people forced to endure the experience actually felt. People like Kathy and Abdulrahman Zeitoun.
Like most Americans, I was saturated with news of New Orleans and Katrina around this time four years ago. I read about the convention center and the Superdome, the pollution and the destruction, the deaths and the displacements. I also heard tales of lawlessness, but I assumed that this was more or less par for the course in the chaos that followed the hurricane. Often, in the wake of a catastrophe like Katrina, there is a period of civil disorder. I assumed that this period would be short lived. I didn’t consider crime to be a major part of the story.
I know now that I was wrong.
Crime is a huge component in the story what happened to the Zeitouns, not because they committed it but because of what was done to them. Kathy and Abdulrahman Zeitoun ran (and still run) Zeitoun A. Painting Contractor LLC, an extremely successful home repair and renovation business. Their work was known and respected throughout New Orleans. They were upright and compassionate in their dealings with their employees and their clients. Abdulrahman, a Syrian by birth and a Muslim, came from a large and loving family; Kathy, whose brief first marriage had ended in divorce, was a convert to Islam. At the time Katrina struck, they had four children; the oldest, Zachary, was Kathy’s son by her first husband.
I was not far into this book when I began to care deeply for these people; and to feel an anxiety on their behalf which, in the event, proved more than justified.
When Katrina began bearing down on New Orleans, Kathy and Zeitoun – he was called that by friends and clients who had trouble pronouncing his first name – faced an agonizing choice. They knew they should leave, but they felt responsible for their various rental properties and jobs in progress. There was the office to look after, and even more important, their home on Dart Street. With some reluctance, they decide that Kathy and the children would go to Baton Rouge and stay with family there, while Zeitoun remained behind in New Orleans. Then, they reasoned, either Kathy would return or Zeitoun would join the family in Baton Rouge. They were counting on the separation lasting no more than a couple of days.
As we crime fiction aficionados are wont to say, Had they but known…
Several years prior, Zeitoun had bought secondhand canoe, a standard aluminum model that a client no longer wanted. When he arrived home with his purchase tied to the top of his van, Kathy took one look and exclaimed: “You’re crazy.” But in the first few days after Katrina struck, the canoe proved to be a Godsend. Zeitoun rescued, or arranged for the rescue of, several elderly persons stranded by high water on the upper floors of their houses. He also rowed to homes where dogs had been abandoned in order to feed and water the animals.
He began to feel quite literally that the canoe had been sent by God and that it was God’s will that he stay behind in order to assist stranded individuals and animals in distress. And that is the work that he and some of his friends were engaged in when something happened that he could never have anticipated, never have thought possible, not in the adopted country that he loved…
If you have already read about Zeitoun, you’ll know what transpires at this point in the narrative. I did not know, so for me, the impact of the story was that much more profound.
I will say no more, except for this: Dave Eggers is directing all the proceeds from the sale of this book to the Zeitoun Foundation, which he and the Zeitoun family set up this year. This gesture on the part of the author is, I think, admirable and generous. (It reminds me of one made by Jon Krakauer in similar circumstances.) So by all means read Zeitoun – and consider purchasing the book as well!
I have never been to New Orleans. This chronicle of devastation and rebirth has made me want to go there.
“He felt like a machine, beyond danger and invulnerable. He had been here many, many times before…” – Strangers on a Train, by Patricia Highsmith: a book group discussion
Guy Haines, an architect, meets Charles Anthony Bruno by chance on a rail journey. Bruno is one of those aggressively friendly people that are often hard to deflect. Although Guy resists, their conversation becomes intensely personal. Gradually, Bruno elicits from Guy the facts concerning his wrecked marriage and his difficulties in obtaining a divorce. For his part, Bruno’s revelation is simpler and more direct: he feels an implacable hatred for his father.
[Caution: Spoilers are coming...]
Finally, Bruno divulges his brilliant idea for a murder: he’ll kill Guy’s wife, and Guy will murder his father. The two murders would be utterly detached from those who had the motive to commit them; this would render them difficult, if not impossible, to solve. Guy is almost physically sickened by Bruno’s scheme:
“Guy had at last thought of the door. He went out and opened another door onto the platform where the cooler air smashed him like a reprimand and the train’s voice rose to an upbraiding blare. He added his own curses of himself to the wind and the train, and longed to be sick.
What exactly is happening here? At this point, Guy has no cause to reproach himself. Yet the words “reprimand” and “upbraiding” suggest that he is already guilty of some kind of transgression. Could it be that he finds that Bruno’s plan, so outrageous and evil on the face of it, also possesses elements that make it intriguing, even attractive? When Guy curses himself, is he acknowledging that attraction, and feeling mortified by it?
At any rate, Guy has only one more night on the train. The next morning he alights in Metcalf, Texas, his home town, to see his mother and to confront Miriam. For the moment, these other concerns drive Bruno from his thoughts. But it turns out that this is a brief respite. Bruno is not so easily dismissed from Guy’s thoughts - or from his life.
Strangers on a Train is a fascinating novel with many twists and turns. Its cast of characters ranges from the severely warped and damaged to cheerfully ordinary folk. But the strangest and hardest of them to understand is Guy Haines. As the novel opens, Guy has everything to live for. Having made the youth mistake of marrying Miriam, a woman in no way worthy of him, he is preparing to divorce her and marry Anne Faulkner. The daughter of wealthy, indulgent parents, Anne is Guy’s lode star, the source of all the goodness and virtue that he longs for in his life: “…she is the sun in my dark forest.” In addition to having found a genuine love that promises future happiness, Guy is a rising star in his profession, the practice of which affords him intense satisfaction. (The almost idolatrous regard in which architecture and its practitioners are held put me in mind of The Fountainhead, and of Frank Lloyd Wright’s seemingly endless hold on the American imagination.)
There is a sense, even from the novel’s beginning, that Guy is poised on a knife edge. Although he sees a way to break through to a radiant life, he has been sullied by Miriam’s crassness and bad behavior.
Here, Guy reveals to Anne the depth of his disgust with Miriam – and by extension with himself and the rest of the world:
“‘She’s everything that should be loathed….Sometimes I think I hate everything in the world. No decency, no conscience. she’s what people mean when they say America never grows up. America rewards the corrupt. She’s the type who goes to bad movies, acts in them, reads the love-story magazines, lives in a bungalow, and whips her husband into earning more money this year so they can buy on the installment plan next year, breaks up her neighbor’s marriage–’”
At this point Anne, alarmed and dismayed by this tirade, begs him to stop. He does, but not before admitting that “‘the fact that I once loved her…loved all of it, makes me ill.’” Guy desperately wants and needs to be rid of Miriam, and not just so he’ll be free to marry Anne. Miriam was like a disease that Guy must expunge from his body and soul in order to feel himself cleansed of sinfulness. Yes, he needs to be rid of her. But not in the way that Bruno envisions.
Bruno, though, has fixed his mind on killing Miriam. He know the act will bind Guy to him. And it does. And so begins a cat-and-mouse game that is at once enthralling and terrifying.
Guy knows full well how repulsed he should be. Sometimes he feels nothing but hatred for Bruno, but at other times he feels a strange fascination, even a twisted kind of love. In the margin on p.146, I scribbled, “Hypocrite lecteur, mon semblable, mon frere.” This phrase, whose exact meaning I can only guess at, has haunted me ever since I studied T.S. Eliot in a graduate school seminar. ( Eliot got it from the poem “Au Lecteur” by Charles Baudelaire.) As the novel progresses, the themes of doubleness and twinning emerge with increasing strength. Increasingly, the reader senses that Bruno is an externalized manifestation of Guy’s own evil impulses.
Just prior to the hardening of his resolve to commit the murder, Guy endures a night of almost exquisite suffering. He senses that all the good in his life – his love for Anne, his artistic creativity – is in danger of slipping away, to be vanquished and replaced by something dreadful:
“Hi,’ Bruno said softly. ‘I got in on a pass key. You’re ready now, aren’t you?’ Bruno sounded calm and tired.
Guy raised himself to one elbow. Of course Bruno was there. The orangey end of his cigarette was there. ‘Yes,’ Guy said, and felt the yes had been silent, not even going out from him. It undid the knot in his head so suddenly that it hurt him. It was what he had been waiting to say, what the silence in the room had been waiting to hear. And the beasts beyond the walls.
And so there has been “a great reckoning in a little room.”
With that ‘yes,’ Guy has signaled that he is ready to commit an unprovoked act of consummate evil, a thing he would not have considered doing before the advent of Charles Anthony Bruno. Guy is now in league with the Devil. Here he is, finally, in Bruno’s house, moments before murdering Bruno’s father:
“He took the knob in his left hand, and his right moved automatically to the gun in his pocket. He felt like a machine, beyond danger and invulnerable. He had been here many, many times before, had killed him many times before, and this was only one of the times.
The sense of evil personified – and yielded to - puts one in mind of the Faust legend (recently encountered in To Heaven By Water – Is everything connected, after all?). An ineluctable fate is being played out in the only way possible. (There is also the sense of base, unconscious impulses working their way up to the surface, of the powerful, amoral id, which values self-preservation above all else in the world, achieving dominance in Guy’s mind.)
Virtually the entire second half of Strangers on a Train is taken up with Guy’s efforts to come to grips with a new sense of himself and to find salvation in the two beacons of his life: his work, and his love for Anne. This struggle is ultimately sabotaged by his equally desperate need to rid himself of the burden of guilt that torments him without respite.
Although compelling, at the same time I found this section of the novel somewhat flawed structurally and in need of tightening. It was Pauline’s view that the ending felt contrived and that Highsmith, to some extent, lost control of her material, IMHO valid observations. In yet another post-discussion e-mail, Barb suggests that with regard to that last point, “…perhaps [Highsmith's] very brilliance can lead us to be more critical of her than of some lesser writers.” And keep in mind, this was a first novel. (And yes – this was the book discussion that kept on going after it had apparently ended!)
Several of us were put in mind of Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment. Others mentioned Dreiser’s An American Tragedy. Although I know the story of the Dreiser work, I’ve never actually read it. The plot of An American Tragedy is based on an actual crime. One of my favorite films, A Place in the Sun, is a variation on the same story. IMHO, its stars are two of the most beautiful people ever to grace the screen: Elizabeth Taylor and Montgomery Clift:
We expended a great deal of effort Tuesday evening parsing the character of Guy Haines. We thought him weak and easily played upon. During the novel’s second half, he alternately agonizes, broods, and vacillates, thereby arousing impatience and exasperation on the part of some readers (myself included).
After our discussion, Frances e-mailed us her thoughts. I find her analysis perceptive and beautifully expressed, and with her permission, quote part of it here:
I’m still thinking about Strangers on a Train. I am trying to fully understand Guy. So far all I have come up with is that his personality is not fully integrated in a healthy way, making him prone to self doubt and unable to take a solid moral stance when seduced and psychologically tortured by Bruno into a psychologically exhausted state which made him “ready” to do anything to get rid of Bruno. Guy’s belief in ordered thinking, whether from Plato’s philosophy of Truth or as in the ideas of the Golden Mean, are constantly undermined by the Chaos, which in this case I think is tantamount to Evil, injected by Bruno keep Guy unbalanced, conflicted and weakened. Blackmailers or sadists never give up and Bruno was both. Guy knows man is capable of good and evil yet is never strong enough to side with the Light. He never decided who he was at his core. He was not able to dismiss his dark side and live a life of rationalized pretense nor is he able to forgive himself understanding he was manipulated into murder…. Maybe he tried to think too much and should have followed his instincts that Bruno was insane and beat a hasty retreat from him. Bruno was relentless though and kept insinuating himself into Guy and later Guy and Anne’s life….. In the end, this is a sad story of two men who were lost before they even met. One wonders if Guy could have been happy with Anne and the child as Anne gives us peeks into her perception of Guy as someone who needed her and who was not a happy sort of man.
Oh, well. It was a great book. I am glad I struggled with it despite my distaste of evil. It slid off the page and disturbed me just as poor Guy was disturbed by Bruno. That is no mean feat for an author to achieve. I sense Highsmith was trying to work out some of these issues in her own life. That is what I thought the long ramblings of the tortured Guy about social law, as well as the wonderings about God and creativity, lost souls and personal conscience were all about, in part, at least. They seemed very personal to me. Just imagine, there she is the author of great talent yet her works are not beautiful in the classic sense. They are marred and defined by their psychological depravity and views into the mind enveloped by darkness. Was she a lost soul as well? Perhaps.
Frances mentioned Tuesday night her feeling that the evil bodied forth in this novel was “seeping” into her. I didn’t have that feeling while I was reading it – but oddly, I have had it while working on this post. I find one point in Frances’s analysis to be especially provocative: “In the end, this is a sad story of two men who were lost before they even met.”
As for Patricia Highsmith and her demons – well, beginning with her troubled childhood and on into her adult life, she certainly had them.
The familiarity of most people with the title Strangers on a Train is largely due to the fame of Hitchcock’s film:
It is almost impossible to talk about the novel without also bringing the film into the discussion. Hitchcock made radical alterations in Highsmith’s narrative. Some of the changes are small: Charles Anthony Bruno’s name becomes “Bruno Anthony.” (Why, I wonder.) But there is one change that is radical: Guy sneaks into the Bruno mansion not in order to kill the paterfamilias but to warn him that his “lunatic” son is trying to arrange his murder. Hitchcock transforms Guy into a beleaguered but basically decent person, a far cry from the tormented soul in Patricia Highsmith’s novel. For those of us who were familiar with the movie but not the novel, the fact that in the latter, Guy actually carried out the murder of Bruno’s father was deeply shocking.
Chris, our discussion leader, asked whether we preferred the film to the novel or vice versa. For me, they were not really comparable. Starting with a very cunning plot premise, Highsmith proceeded to write an immensely powerful psychological novel. Hitchcock’s film is a masterpiece of suspense and contains some of cinema’s most memorable scenes (the tennis match, Miriam’s murder, the out-of-control merry-go-round at the climax). But they are two distinct and different entities.
(In the role of Bruno, Robert Walker is riveting. It was his last great role: he died soon after making this film. He was 32 years old.)
In addition to those already mentioned, Strangers on a Train brings to mind other writers and literary works. Guy’s brooding indecisiveness put me in mind of Hamlet – “Oh that this too, too solid flesh would melt….” His losing battle with the forces of evil made me think of Hawthorne – the Reverend Dimmesdale in The Scarlet Letter and even more so, some of the short stories. In tales like “The Minister’s Black Veil” and “Young Goodman Brown,” Hawthorne evokes a sense of sinfulness so dreadful it cannot even be named. The Devil lurks at the margins, waiting to spring into action. Henry James internalized this force brilliantly in the hapless, hysterical ( or is she hyper intuitive?) governess in The Turn of the Screw.
Patricia Highsmith may have been a troubled individual with her own share of negative personality traits, but one senses that her education in the liberal arts (at Barnard College) served her well.
Tuesday night’s discussion was immensely enjoyable. I can thinking of nothing more invigorating than hanging out with a group of such vibrant intellectuals. It’s like being back in a college, minus the papers and exams. And the fact that all are so devoted to crime fiction gladdens my heart and heightens my respect and affection for the genre.
Early on a Monday afternoon, a disabled youth with the unusual name of Ebenezer Moulton presents himself at the Micklegate Bar Police Station in York. He has come from his father’s funeral – has, in fact, walked the entire way, not an easy feat for one on crutches.
Carmen Pharoah, the duty CID officer, conducts the interview. She has her hands full trying to bring Moulton around to stating the real purpose for his visit. Frustrated with his rambling monologue, she at last demands to know where he is going. At which point he blurts out:
“‘I saw a man killed. Murdered. Done in. That’s where I am going.’”
Carmen Pharoah has finally got her answer, and she is well and truly amazed. But that is just the beginning of a string of bizarre revelations. It seems that the murder Ebenezer Moulton witnessed took place some twenty years ago, during a period of flooding in the Vale of York. Four men were parties to the crime. One of them was none other than Walpole Moulton, the father he has just buried…
Alas for the Vale of York, the floods have come again. Numerous families have been evacuated from their homes and given temporary shelter. All of these vacant domiciles prove irresistible to the fraternity of local housebreakers. When we meet Norman Budde, a member in good standing of this less-than-illustrious cohort, he is filling his hold-all with booty as he sloshes through just such a waterlogged premises. But Norman is in for a rude shock: upon entering one of the upstairs bedrooms, he comes upon the body of a young man, slain execution-style and laid out peaceably as though for a wake. Norman is out of there in a flash, but not being a totally irresponsible citizen, he calls the police and tips them off – anonymously, of course – concerning his “find.”
(Norman has been tenderly trained up in his vocation by his father and a raft of uncles. This family is like something out of Charles Dickens:
“‘Always think there is someone in the house until you know otherwise’ was the good advice one of his uncles had once given him, to which his father, who was present, had said, ‘That’s good advice, Norman’, and his mother who was also present had smiled and said, ‘Can you pass the peas please?’)
So: two floods, and two murders, both separated by a period of twenty years. Suddenly DCI Hennessey and his team have their hands full. Hennessey is, as always, grateful to have such exceptionally dedicated and capable officers to work with. In addition to the aforementioned Carmen Pharoah, there’s his long time second-in-commend Somerled Yellich. Thompson Ventnor and Reginald Webster make up the rest of the team.
Each of these individuals has something in his or her personal life that is distinctive: a tragedy, a weakness, a secret. We know some interesting information of this sort is soon to be imparted by the author when he telegraphs his intentions at the beginning of a chapter, e.g. “…Reginald Webster is at home to the most charitable reader.” I find this antiquated locution quite delightful. A similar mode of expression is occasionally present in the dialog, as for instance in Hennessey’s comment in the title of this post.
To my amazement, I find that this is the fourth book in the Hennessey / Yellich series that I’ve reviewed on this blog. The others are No Stone Unturned, Once a Biker, and Chill Factor. In the first two, I talked about the wonders of York in general, and of its glorious Minster especially. There is a scene in Turning Point that takes place in Ripon, a cathedral city not far from Harrogate, where our 2007 Smithsonian tour tour began. The cathedral itself is ancient and beautiful. (This post has the pictures we took there.) And Ripon works to hold fast to its heritage and its history.
Thompson and Ventnor have come to this city to interview Penny Hill, the widow of one of the murder victims:
“Her home in Ripon was near the market place with its huge stone column and where the horn blower blows his horn, as a horn blower has done so for centuries, once at each corner of the square, announcing the coming of the twenty-first hour, and doing so each day of the year, including Christmas Day and no matter what the weather conditions.
I began reading Peter Turnbull’s crime fiction with the series featuring the “P” Division in Glasgow. Toward the end of the 1990′s, Turnbull dropped that series and began the current one. And he turns them out at a good clip: nineteen since 1999! I’ve read about half of them. The latest is Informed Consent (2009), which follows Turning Point (2008). I’ve read about half of them. and I love them. The plots are inventive, the writing is meticulous, the setting, of course, is great, and at this point I am heavily invested in the lives of Hennessey and company. Hennessey himself is inching toward retirement, though he’s reluctant (as am I, on his behalf).
I find the author himself rather mysterious. I’ve searched for a recent picture of him, but I keep coming up with the one I’ve used in previous posts. (It was obtained from the site Tangled Web UK, which does not have updated information on his books.) In a brief but informative essay in The Mammoth Encyclopedia of Modern Crime Fiction, compiled by Mike Ashley (2002), we learn that Peter Turnbull has a nonfiction title to his credit: The Killer Who Never Was (1996). The subject? Jack the Ripper.
Ashley has high praise for the “P” Division novels: “The series is noted not only for its suspenseful atmosphere and realism but also for its tight plotting and portrayal of local colour.”
Scene of the Crime: A Guide to the Landscapes of British Detective Fiction by Julian Earwaker and Kathleen Becker (2002) is one of my favorite mystery references. In this passage, the authors offer some insight on how Turnbull came to the writing of crime fiction:
“Icy rain and freezing winter winds were blowing around Glasgow’s tower blocks and tenements when Peter Turnbull (1950 -) entered the city in 1977 as a young social worker. shocked and angered to learn that the community of Easterhouse had ‘more people living in it than the city of Perth – with just one shopping centre and four pubs,’ Turnbull wrote his atmospheric debut Deep and Crisp and Even (1981).
[Mike Ashley also has high praise for this novel.]
As I often do when I fail to find any reliable information online – no Wikipedia entry! – I tried the Gale Database Biography Resource Center and was gratified to find two short but illuminating entries. From Contemporary Authors Online we glean the following regarding Peter Turnbull’s career:
“Strathclyde Regional Council, Glasgow, Scotland, social worker, 1978-95; full-time writer, 1995–. Worked as steelworker and crematorium assistant in Sheffield and London, and as a social worker in Brooklyn, NY.
Well, that had some surprises in it! I wonder if Turnbull has considered penning a memoir…
Here’s how the entry in the St. James Guide to Crime & Mystery Writers commences: “The crime novels of Peter Turnbull are reassuringly familiar in form, with satisfying surprises and twists in their plotting, and an interesting cast of characters.” I think it’s that quality of being “reassuringly familiar in form” that in large part keeps me coming back to this series in particular, and to the British police procedural in general.